North Stonington – The Planning and Zoning Commission voted to approve the town’s Plan of Conservation and Development Thursday after more than a year’s worth of work and three public hearings.

Town Planner Juliet Leeming spent more than a year writing the nearly 100-page plan, incorporating feedback from community meetings and a survey that garnered more than 400 responses. The plan lays out detailed ideas that address the town’s chief dilemma – how to preserve its beloved rural character while bringing in economic development.

At Thursday’s meeting, Leeming and members of the commission hashed out the final details of the plan – largely minor edits and clarifications. Changes included rewording the vision statement to better reflect the master planning emphasized in the document.

Since the beginning of the public comment period last month, Leeming said she has incorporated stronger language to support the town’s historic resources.

Some members expressed hesitation at some of the plan’s ambitions, such as bringing in a hotel and promoting “carefully planned” farm worker housing. But Leeming said she wanted to make sure residents’ comments expressed during the public comment period were reflected in the plan.

The plan’s colorful architects’ renderings of future landscaping, farm stands and housing are merely ideas, Leeming said, not plans set in stone.

No one besides the committee members attended the meeting – a sharp departure from the first public hearing, which Leeming said drew about 70 people, and the two continuations that drew a few dozen more.

“The public obviously is comfortable enough with what’s in it to not be freaking out right now,” Leeming told committee members.

Leeming will incorporate the edits made Thursday before submitting the plan to the state Office of Policy Management.

a.isaacs@theday.com

Last year on December 14, I felt compelled to collect my daughter earlier than usual from her kindergarten here in Albuquerque, New Mexico. I encountered a number of other distraught parents driven by a similar impulse. Earlier that day and 1,800 miles away, an armed intruder gunned down 20 children and six adults at an elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut—the deadliest K-12 school shooting in U.S. history.

Because the intruder used a gun to shoot through tempered glass at the school entrance to gain access, many school districts and facility designers instantly began focusing their attention on using stronger glass or supplementing existing windows. Meanwhile, the Newtown school board quickly requested police officers at all of its elementary schools. Since that terrible morning, more than 450 legislative bills related to school safety have been filed across the country, including proposals to arm teachers—an appalling thought for the majority of Americans.

No doubt, school environments will be changing, and how safety concerns manifest themselves raises a disturbing question: Are our children’s schools destined to look and feel increasingly like correctional facilities?

According to Peter Calthorpe, a Berkeley, California-based architect and founding member of the Congress for New Urbanism, the answer is no. He assured me that “good design can make schools safer without compromising the aesthetics of a pleasant learning atmosphere for kids.”

The original building at New York’s Somers High School had been expanded several times and lacked an identifiable, secure front entrance. New additions included a highly visible entry corridor and main office suite. (PHOTO: DAVID LAMB PHOTOGRAPHY)

For Calthorpe, the primary concern related to safety begins with building type. “It’s not as if there weren’t always bad guys and that public safety is a new concern,” he said. “But with the advent of modernist architecture, buildings started to lose capacity to define public space. As a result, inferior solutions for securing a place, like fencing, emerge after the fact. Traditional courtyard buildings, on the other hand, such as those popular in most traditional cities, make a clear distinction between the street and the shared private space within.”

He is putting his ideas into practice with the relocation and expansion of Vincent Academy, a charter school that currently serves 135 elementary school students from kindergarten through third grade in a small building in West Oakland. The violence-prone area is vastly different from the affluent bedroom community of Newtown, Connecticut. In fact, with the Vincent Academy project, the architect’s surveyors were mugged while examining the new site for the school. The school’s move will enable it to expand to serve some 350 students through fifth grade as well as to partner with BRIDGE Housing in combining quality education, affordable housing, and support services for both residents and families of students. The project, Calthorpe hopes, will create an anchor for revitalization.

Among other safety aspects, the future Vincent Academy, expected to be open for the 2015-16 school year, will feature two buildings with controlled access to the campus between them; a reception area at the main entrance overlooking much of the play yard; landscaping with low bushes and shrubs that won’t furnish enough cover as a place to hide; and an eight-foot fence made of open pickets and solid panels that will allow some privacy yet still enable emergency responders to view the site.

If students from Vincent Academy go on to enter the public school system, they will not be expected to pass through metal detectors each morning; the Oakland Unified School District does not use them.

“The use of metal detectors, ‘wanding,’ and random bag checks in public schools is justifiably contested for the messages they send students,” said Paul Timm of RETA Security, an independent firm based outside of Chicago that has been consulting schools on safety matters for decades. “While it is true there’s more violence on a regular basis in urban areas simply because of the sheer population density, violent crimes mostly take place off of school grounds. Other school safety measures, like electronic access systems, are more universally efficient at creating a safer school environment. But their value is determined by the people operating them.”

Regardless of building type, or demographics, a number of universal changes can be expected in school design and operation. “Schools are being designed with more perimeter control, where there’s only one way in and one way out, often with personnel there or a locked vestibule to enable the school to ensure that the person there is supposed to be there,” said Russell Davidson, president of Mount Kisco, New York-based KGD Architects, which has been specializing in educational facility design for more than 70 years. Davidson noted a number of other important safety features likely to become more common in schools: security cameras, fencing around courtyards, classroom doors that can be locked from the inside, two-way communication systems in classes, and corridors that can be locked down in sections.

City planner Oscar Newman’s 1972 classic Defensible Space outlines a design theory for the creation of safer neighborhoods. Among other factors, Newman posited that a place’s security is closely linked to its inhabitants’ ability to see what’s going on around them.

Four decades later, the premise was called into question immediately following Sandy Hook. “After Newtown, a lot of talk centered around the glass on classroom doors, that perhaps the windows should be covered so intruders can’t see in at all,” said Davidson. “But that notion was quickly reconsidered given the value of being able to see what’s going on from within. Visibility is closely tied to security; if people can be seen, they tend to behave better. Though, it’s still very important to have a significant ‘blind space’ for students in classrooms to be able to obscure themselves when necessary.”

The Post Road Elementary School in White Plains, New York, incorporates security systems for access control and visitor management that built upon visibility, monitoring, and communications. (PHOTO: DAVID LAMB PHOTOGRAPHY)

Perimeter control, however, should be a first priority in thwarting the unthinkable, said Davidson. And with new construction, he added, “campus-style schools, with separate buildings for different departments, are likely to become less common, since it’s easier to maintain perimeter control with a single building.”

Jim Graham, principal architect at Schenectady, New York-based Synthesis LLP, agreed. “Modern schools are inherently sprawling and require many access points, which are often the cause of well-intentioned individuals roaming the school property looking for the right way in,” he said. “Ultimately, this results in a culture of ambivalence toward individuals walking the site. Who hasn’t been let into a building by the kind staff person or student when knocking at a side door?”

Graham’s firm, which has been practicing in the K-12 market for more than 15 years, is focused on creating more compact layouts that reduce perimeter areas and access points while promoting clear, efficient interior circulation. Especially when developed with traffic safety improvements, Graham said these elements can collectively produce a more controllable and defined main entry. Additionally, site layout and planned landscaping that optimizes visibility will help enhance passive security—an important tenet of Newman’s Defensible Space theory—so that individuals approaching the building anywhere other than through the main entry are more noticeable.

“But other steps must also be taken,” Griffin said. “Most schools have or are currently retrofitting entry vestibules with security cameras and access controls. These vary greatly, and their success is dependent in many ways on individual operators. A balance of passive security planning and implementation of local control components is necessary to establish the foundation of a secure campus or building.”

Complicating the issue, of course, is that security concerns must also address the prospective dangers associated with the very people who belong on campus. “Often these shootings are perpetrated by students, most often those who are marginalized, bullied, or falling through the cracks unnoticed,” said Alan Ford, a Colorado architect and president of the Rocky Mountain Chapter of the Council of Educational Facility Planners. Architecture can only go so far in addressing these wider concerns.

Colorado, at least, has had the benefit of progressive legislation after the hard lessons learned in the aftermath of the Columbine High School shootings in 1999 and subsequent tragedies. After an incident in 2006, when an armed intruder entered Platte Canyon High School, held several girls hostage for hours, sexually assaulted them, and shot one to death before killing himself, Senator Tom Wiens introduced a bill that set the framework for state-wide enhanced school safety. That bill was followed by legislation addressing anti-bullying measures, emergency communication and education, and grant writing support for providing school resource officers.

In 2010, Ford organized the International School Safety Convention, which brought together architects, facility planners, first responders, lawmakers, state education leaders, superintendents, grant writers, and others to address “next-generation” school safety concerns and priorities. Among them, he said “it’s important for schools to be more actively involved in the undercurrent of student culture. Some police districts are even training school resource officers to become more present at schools, not simply as armed security guards but as extra eyes to observe the nuances of student life.”

If that thought sounds slightly Orwellian, Ford offered a broader perspective to frame the issue in terms that preclude personnel considerations or even facility design: “There are so many complex aspects that must be examined: social, socio-economic, cultural, psychological. And then, there’s the school itself!”

As far as addressing safety at the school itself goes, experts like Ford all agree. “You just can’t completely plan around armed intrusions, so it’s important to implement measures that provide a coordinated response and that slow prospective intrusions,” Ford said.

Carl Thurnau, facilities director for the New York State Education Department, echoed Ford’s statement: “You can’t predict every scenario, but what you can do is buy time in the event of an emergency.”

To that end, Thurnau noted that New York boasts a generous building aid program for schools in the state. (This is on top of the 10 percent additional funding for electronic security and “door hardening” enhancements provided through the auspices of the NY SAFE Act, a gun control law that was passed a month after Sandy Hook. An active repeal effort now targets the act.) “There is room to work with,” he said. “So making it harder for an intruder to gain access to a classroom is really important. Doors can be made stronger; film can be adhered to windows to make the glass shatterproof and less penetrable.”

Like several architects and designers, Thurnau said that addressing safety concerns will likely come with some nominal inconvenience to students, staff, and parents. “Yes, it may take a little more time getting in and out of schools, but it’s not unlike what we all had to go through with airport security 10 years ago,” he said.

Indeed, many parallels can be drawn between the challenges of school safety and homeland security. But one of the singularly disconcerting things about school shootings like Sandy Hook, which make any parent shudder, is the notion that the enemy may be something of our own cultural making—and will require more than the many enhanced security measures that are to become standardized.

Last month, Sandy Hook Elementary School was demolished. A new school is expected to open on the same site in 2016.

In the meantime, Thurnau said he believes, as do Peter Calthorpe and the other architects I interviewed, that good design can create safer schools without making them into austere, prison-like environments. And he is uniquely qualified to know: Thurnau, who oversees building activity for hundreds of schools in the state of New York, began his career in the construction of correctional facilities. “We are making outstanding and beautiful facilities,” he said. “And I’ve always felt that if we build better schools, we won’t have to build as many prisons.”

Mobile users can view the slideshow here: http://tinyurl.com/kzksrq9

KHQ.COM – It’s that of the year again when families light up their houses with colorful lights! If you’re looking for some ideas we’ve put together a slideshow for you above. We also want to see your home decked out! You can either send your pictures to PIX@khq.com or upload them on our KHQ Facebook Christmas Lights page….you can view the page here: https://www.facebook.com/KHQChristmasLights?fref=ts

CARLISLE — The South of South Street Association will cap off nearly two years of work with the grand re-opening of the Butcher Family Tot Lot Saturday.

Rather than a traditional ribbon cutting, children will slide down the new 9-foot sliding board to cut the ribbon, said Annie Oiler, one of the coordinators of the project.

The ceremony will be at 10 a.m. Saturday at the Butcher Family Tot Lot, located at 46 Chestnut Ave., in the block between South Hanover and South Pitt streets and Walnut and Chestnut streets.

“We’re just really excited that it’s all come together,” Oiler said.

Perhaps the most visible work happened during the month of November when borough crews removed the old equipment and started installing the new equipment. About a dozen neighbors also gathered for a work day, during which they cleared the brush and repainted the fence and the swing sets, Oiler said.

Along with the playground equipment, the basketball pad was extended by five feet, a new fence was installed along Chestnut Avenue, and four additional benches will be installed.

“Families won’t outgrow the park as quick as they would before,” Oiler said.

Carlisle Recreation and Parks Director Andrea Crouse said it’s exciting to listen to ideas from the neighborhood groups and then see them come to fruition.

“Just like the neighborhoods within the borough, the needs of each park project is different,” she said. “I think the neighborhood associations have done an outstanding job of capturing the needs and wants of their neighborhoods.”

The department often provides technical assistance for park planning and grant writing, Crouse said. It also helps coordinate the installation of the equipment and amenities.

There is still work to be done. Oiler said the landscaping will be done in the spring since it had to wait until after the equipment was installed. The neighborhood association has also adopted the park, and will keep an eye on it to monitor it for future maintenance needs.

“We’re not actively fundraising, but if anyone wants to donate, we’ll take it,” Oiler said.

In April, the borough received a $19,000 grant from Cumberland County’s Land Partnership Program specifically for the project’s playground equipment.

“That was a matching grant, so we had to have that in our funds,” Oiler said.

The association also received a $5,000 grant from Partnership for Better Health, and a $1,000 donation from the Carlisle Walmart to add to the funds donated by local businesses and residents, Oiler said.

Bimbo Bakeries also purchased a piece of equipment worth about $5,000, she said.

Email Tammie Gitt at tgitt@cumberlink.com or follow her on Twitter @SentinelGitt

To use this website, cookies must be enabled in your browser. To enable cookies, follow the instructions for your browser below.

Enabling Cookies in Internet Explorer 7, 8 9

1. Open the Internet Browser
2. Click Tools Internet OptionsPrivacyAdvanced
3. Check Override automatic cookie handling
4. For First-party Cookies and Third-party Cookies click Accept
5. Click OK and OK

Enabling Cookies in Firefox

1. Open the Firefox browser
2. Click ToolsOptionsPrivacyUse custom settings for history
3. Check Accept cookies from sites
4. Check Accept third party cookies
5. Select Keep until: they expire
6. Click OK

Enabling Cookies in Google Chrome

1. Open the Google Chrome browser
2. Click Tools iconOptionsUnder the HoodContent Settings
3. Check Allow local data to be set
4. Uncheck Block third-party cookies from being set
5. Uncheck Clear cookies
6. Close all

Enabling Cookies in Mobile Safari (iPhone, iPad)

1. Go to the Home screen by pressing the Home button or by unlocking your phone/iPad
2. Select the Settings icon.
3. Select Safari from the settings menu.
4. Select ‘accept cookies’ from the safari menu.
5. Select ‘from visited’ from the accept cookies menu.
6. Press the home button to return the the iPhone home screen.
7. Select the Safari icon to return to Safari.
8. Before the cookie settings change will take effect, Safari must restart. To restart Safari press and hold the Home button (for around five seconds) until the iPhone/iPad display goes blank and the home screen appears.
9. Select the Safari icon to return to Safari.

Comments (0)